This post is one part of a series – called Practical Lessons from Policy Theories and it summarizes this article (PDF).
‘Policy entrepreneurs’ invest their time wisely for future reward, and possess key skills that help them adapt particularly well to their environments. They are the agents for policy change who possess the knowledge, power, tenacity, and luck to be able to exploit key opportunities. They draw on three strategies:
1. Don’t focus on bombarding policymakers with evidence.
Scientists focus on making more evidence to reduce uncertainty, but put people off with too much information. Entrepreneurs tell a good story, grab the audience’s interest, and the audience demands information.
2. By the time people pay attention to a problem it’s too late to produce a solution.
So, you produce your solution then chase problems.
3. When your environment changes, your strategy changes.
For example, in the US federal level, you’re in the sea, and you’re a surfer waiting for the big wave. In the smaller subnational level, on a low attention and low budget issue, you can be Poseidon moving the ‘streams’. In the US federal level, you need to ‘soften’ up solutions over a long time to generate support. In subnational or other countries, you have more opportunity to import and adapt ready-made solutions.
It all adds up to one simple piece of advice – timing and luck matters when making a policy case – but policy entrepreneurs know how to influence timing and help create their own luck.
Full paper: Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs
(Note: the previous version was friendlier and more focused on entrepreneurs)
For more on ‘multiple streams’ see:
Paul Cairney and Michael Jones (2016) ‘Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory?’ Policy Studies Journal, 44, 1, 37-58 PDF (Annex to Cairney Jones 2016) (special issue of PSJ)
Paul Cairney and Nikos Zahariadis (2016) ‘Multiple streams analysis: A flexible metaphor presents an opportunity to operationalize agenda setting processes’ in Zahariadis, N. (eds) Handbook of Public Policy Agenda-Setting (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar) PDF see also
I use a space launch metaphor in the paper. If you prefer different images, have a look at 5 images of the policy process. If you prefer a watery metaphor (it’s your life, I suppose), click Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: Multiple Streams Analysis
For more on entrepreneurs:
Pingback: The role of evidence in UK policymaking after Brexit | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Policy in 500 Words: Multiple Streams Analysis and Policy Entrepreneurs | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: The role of ‘standards for evidence’ in ‘evidence informed policymaking’ | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: 5 images of the policy process | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: The impact of multi-level policymaking on the UK energy system | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Great Read!
Pingback: Practical Lessons from Policy Theories | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Evidence based policymaking: 7 key themes | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: What is a policy entrepreneur? | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: A 5-step strategy to ‘make evidence count’* | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: #EU4Facts: 3 take-home points from the JRC annual conference | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Why don’t policymakers listen to your evidence? | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: UK law on medicinal cannabis changed six months ago – what have we learned? – The Conversation – Cannabis Studies
Pingback: Policy Analysis in 750 words: William Riker (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Policy Analysis in 750 words: the old page | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Policy Analysis in 750 Words: What can you realistically expect policymakers to do? | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Policy Analysis in 750 Words: entrepreneurial policy analysis | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Research engagement with government: insights from research on policy analysis and policymaking | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy