Great post by Professor Karin Ingold on the potential for different roles for scientists in evidence informed policymaking
Integration and Implementation Insights
Community member post by Karin Ingold
Karin Ingold (biography)
What roles can science and scientific experts adopt in policymaking? One way of examining this is through the Advocacy Coalition Framework (Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1993). This framework highlights that policymaking and the negotiations regarding a political issue—such as reform of the health system, or the introduction of an energy tax on fossil fuels—is dominated by advocacy coalitions in opposition. Advocacy coalitions are groups of actors sharing the same opinion about how a policy should be designed and implemented. Each coalition has its own beliefs and ideologies and each wants to see its preferences translated into policies.
I build on the work of Weible and colleagues (2010), who distinguish three types of ‘subsystems’ in which policy is made:
- a collaborative subsystem, where at least two coalitions exist; they have different opinions, but want to overcome them
- an adversarial subsystem, where…
View original post 526 more words
Pingback: How far should you go to privilege evidence? 2. Policy theories, scenarios, and ethical dilemmas | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Policy in 500 Words: The advocacy coalition framework | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
Pingback: Using policy theories to interpret public health case studies: the example of a minimum unit price for alcohol | Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy